ArticlePloS one2026
Confidence-guided integration of otoscopy videos and tympanometry for middle ear disease diagnosis: A multi-center otoscopy study with external paired-cohort evaluation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of middle ear diseases using otoscopy remains challenging, particularly in primary care settings where clinician experience with otoscopy varies and visual examination alone may not fully capture middle ear physiology. Although AI-based models have shown promise for automated otoscopy interpretation, most rely primarily on visual information, creating an opportunity to improve diagnostic robustness by integrating complementary physiological measurements. Here, we present OtoTymp-AI, a confidence-guided multimodal decision-fusion framework that integrates otoscopy video analysis with conventional 226 Hz tympanometry. A convolutional neural network was trained to classify otoscopy videos, and tympanometric measurements were incorporated through a clinically interpretable, rule-guided decision strategy to refine visually uncertain predictions rather than through jointly trained multimodal representation learning. Within this multi-center otoscopy study, multimodal evaluation was performed in one independent external cohort comprising 104 videos with paired tympanometry across six diagnostic categories. In this exploratory paired-cohort analysis, the video-only CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 63.46% (95% CI, 53.88-72.08), while the hybrid video-plus-tympanometry framework achieved 81.73% accuracy (95% CI, 73.22-87.98) at the best observed threshold of 0.90, corresponding to an observed absolute improvement of 18.27 percentage points over the CNN-only model (95% paired bootstrap CI, 9.62-26.92). Improvements were observed for selected categories represented in this cohort, including effusion and retraction, although confidence intervals were wide for categories with small positive sample sizes. These findings suggest that integrating anatomical video information with physiological tympanometry may improve AI-assisted middle ear diagnosis in this external paired cohort, but the operating threshold and per-class performance require confirmation in larger prospective paired multimodal cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.