Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678935›Full record

ReviewPLOS digital health2026

The promise and peril of AI for disability health equity: A justice-centered narrative review.

Jyoti Dalal, Douglas Teodoro, Minerva Rivas Velarde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jyoti DalalInstitute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5817-026X
Douglas TeodoroDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Minerva Rivas VelardeHES-SO University of Applied Arts Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the promising potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models to enhance health equities for persons with disabilities, poorly designed applications risk exacerbating inequities. To address this, we conducted a narrative review using disability justice frameworks as an analytical lens to evaluate how AI applications operationalize disability and health equity across various domains. AI models demonstrate potential in early intervention, personalized care, equitable resource allocation, assistive technologies, and health surveillance. However, most AI models rely primarily on biomedical and functional data, often trained on biased datasets that neglect social and structural determinants of disability. As a result, these applications insufficiently capture broader dimensions of wellbeing, including capabilities, recognition, and structural justice, limiting their effectiveness in addressing health inequities. To advance health equity for persons with disabilities, AI applications must incorporate disability-inclusive datasets, participatory co-design with persons with disabilities, auditing for fairness, and real-world validation. Integrating clinical, social, and structural dimensions in a justice-oriented framework can help AI models move beyond narrow biomedical models toward more inclusive, context-sensitive, and equitable health systems.

Identifiers

PMID42678935
PMCPMC13533375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.