ReviewPLOS digital health2026
The promise and peril of AI for disability health equity: A justice-centered narrative review.
Review in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the promising potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models to enhance health equities for persons with disabilities, poorly designed applications risk exacerbating inequities. To address this, we conducted a narrative review using disability justice frameworks as an analytical lens to evaluate how AI applications operationalize disability and health equity across various domains. AI models demonstrate potential in early intervention, personalized care, equitable resource allocation, assistive technologies, and health surveillance. However, most AI models rely primarily on biomedical and functional data, often trained on biased datasets that neglect social and structural determinants of disability. As a result, these applications insufficiently capture broader dimensions of wellbeing, including capabilities, recognition, and structural justice, limiting their effectiveness in addressing health inequities. To advance health equity for persons with disabilities, AI applications must incorporate disability-inclusive datasets, participatory co-design with persons with disabilities, auditing for fairness, and real-world validation. Integrating clinical, social, and structural dimensions in a justice-oriented framework can help AI models move beyond narrow biomedical models toward more inclusive, context-sensitive, and equitable health systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.