Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678926›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Distinguishing dog-bite and rabies vulnerability in children to strengthen global elimination efforts.

Harish Kumar Tiwari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Harish Kumar TiwariJyoti and Bhupat Mehta School of Health Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-9895

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dog-mediated rabies remains a preventable cause of mortality in children, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where free-roaming dogs are common. While the WHO-led "Zero by 30" strategy emphasises mass dog vaccination and access to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), less attention has been paid to the behavioural and communication pathways that shape children's vulnerability. This Viewpoint proposes a conceptual distinction between vulnerability to dog bites and vulnerability to rabies following exposure. Conflating these risks may contribute to diffuse messaging and missed prevention opportunities. This Viewpoint argues for a differentiated child-facing and adult-facing interventions, with schools positioned as adaptable platforms for integrating safe behaviour, disclosure, and timely care-seeking within existing systems. Aligning behavioural, educational, and biomedical components more explicitly may strengthen implementation of global rabies elimination strategies and reduce paediatric deaths.

Indexed as

Bites and StingsDisease EradicationDog DiseasesRabiesAnimalsChildDogsGlobal HealthHumansPost-Exposure ProphylaxisRabies VaccinesRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID42678926
PMCPMC13533358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.