ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Improving practical steerability of a bidirectional steerable catheter for ERCP by non-straight wire routing.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires reliable bile duct cannulation, yet steerability of wire-driven steerable catheters (SCs) can deteriorate when the shaft is constrained, partly because actuation may induce unintended shaft-side deformation and transmission loss. This study evaluated whether non-straight wire-routing architectures could improve practical steerability of a bidirectional SC for ERCP. Three prototypes were developed: a conventional straight-wiring design (SC#0), a non-straight, non-crossed design (SC#1), and a non-straight, crossed design (SC#2). Steerability was assessed by incremental wire-pulling tests under straight-shaft and loose-shaft conditions and by a mock ERCP study using an actual duodenoscope. Outcomes included the handle displacement and pulling force required to reach 85° distal bending (HD
Indexed as
Identifiers
42678652What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.