Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678650›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2026

Nationwide patterns of cataract surgery in Japan: facility-level volume and outpatient versus inpatient procedures using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims (NDB).

Susumu Kunisawa, Yuichi Imanaka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Susumu KunisawaDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. kunisawa.susumu.2v@kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3657-8686
Yuichi ImanakaDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H00448Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K13607Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 25IA1002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCataract surgery is among the most commonly performed types of surgery in Japan, but the actual surgical volume at the healthcare facility level remains unclear. This is partly because a substantial number of cataract surgical procedures are performed in clinics, making comprehensive investigation of relevant data difficult. This study used the National Database of Health Insurance Claims (NDB) to elucidate the number of surgical procedures, including outpatient procedures, performed at the facility level. STUDY

designRetrospective observational study.

methodsUsing NDB data, we determined the number of cataract surgical procedures performed at the facility level over a 9-year period (fiscal years 2016-2024). We also analyzed the proportion of procedures performed in outpatient settings.

resultsApproximately 4,500 facilities performed cataract surgery each year, with the number of facilities increasing. Although variations were observed across prefectures, no systematic regional patterns emerged. In most regions, facilities typically performed 100-300 procedures per year. Many facilities operate entirely at outpatient settings, while others operate entirely at inpatient settings. Facility-level outpatient practice patterns varied substantially across procedure-volume categories. This descriptive pattern was observed across the 9-year period.

conclusionsThese nationwide facility-level data provide an important baseline for understanding cataract surgery practice in Japan. These findings may support future research and health policy discussions on cataract surgery practice across healthcare facilities.

Indexed as

Cataract surgeryNDBQuality indicatorSurgery volume

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.