Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678645›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

A framework for delivering real-time, instrument-relative navigation in transoral robotic surgery.

Jose O Romero, Sudi A Zhao, Michaela M Geffert, Ehsan Nasiri, Elizabeth C Anderson, Yuan Shi, Phoebe S Xu, Michael A Kokko, Ryan J Halter, Joseph A Paydarfar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jose O Romero *Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA. Jose.O.Romero.MED@dartmouth.edu.
Sudi A Zhao *Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Michaela M GeffertDepartment of Surgery - Otolaryngology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Ehsan NasiriThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Elizabeth C AndersonDepartment of Surgery - Otolaryngology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Yuan ShiThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Phoebe S XuGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Michael A KokkoThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Ryan J HalterGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Joseph A PaydarfarGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is a minimally invasive, inside-out technique that, compared with traditional open approaches, provides fewer post-operative complications, shorter hospital stays, and improved survival for early-stage head and neck cancer. However, TORS is limited by its steep learning curve and poor visualization of deep tumor margins. This randomized crossover study evaluated a surgical navigation system's potential to enhance accuracy and user experience with real-time, instrument-relative feedback. Seven Teflon beads (d = 2.381 mm) were embedded at the tongue base of a porcine pharynx-and-larynx model. Tongue blade compression and retraction were applied to the model to mimic intraoperative tissue deformation, reproducing the anatomical shifts that occur relative to preoperative imaging. Eight participants used the da Vinci Surgical system to localize the beads by placing pins under two conditions: (a) preoperative computed tomography with no navigation; (b) model-based visual navigation with quantitative instrument-to-target metrics. Surgical accuracy was determined by calculating the target localization error (TLE, pin-to-bead Euclidean distance) and the angular error (AE, pin axis trajectory to bead). Accounting for training level and bead depth, surgical navigation reduced TLE by 5.44 mm (95% CI, 4.02-6.86 mm; p = 2.00e-11) and AE by 8.47 degrees (95% CI, 6.21-10.72 degrees; p = 5.17e-11). Impressions of the system were generally favorable using a 5-point Likert survey and task duration (p = 0.26) or cognitive workload via the NASA-Task Load Index (p = 0.22) were not significantly affected. The navigation system demonstrated translational promise, offering improved target localization accuracy and more consistent performance across experience levels, two critical determinants of surgical quality in TORS.

Indexed as

Natural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical Navigation SystemsAnimalsCross-Over StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansSwineTomography, X-Ray ComputedCognitive workloadImage guidanceRobotic trainingSurgical navigationTarget localizationTransoral robotic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.