ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026
Strengthening School Safety Through Governmental Research-Practice Partnerships: the Arizona School Safety Program.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Government research-practice partnerships (GRPPs) can bridge the gap between empirical research and policy implementation. However, it remains unclear precisely how state-level governmental agencies navigate evidence-based policymaking. The ongoing collaboration between the Arizona Department of Education and the research team at Arizona State University began as a need for an annual evaluation of the School Safety Program, which aims to improve school safety by providing funding and training to school resource officers and school mental health professionals throughout the state. Unique to this relationship is the structure of the power dynamics between the university and the state. Specifically, this partnership inverts the typical arrangement in which the research team traditionally controls funding, deadlines, and data access. This partnership exemplifies how GRPPs can bridge research and policy by integrating collaborative evaluation frameworks and co-created logic models that serve as boundary objects, facilitating shared language, trust, and sustained engagement across organizational boundaries. The manuscript details operational challenges, including navigating divergent institutional timelines, complex data governance, and dissemination demands, while highlighting mutual capacity-building that enhances both research rigor and policy relevance. Perspectives from both government and academic partners underscore the bidirectional benefits of the partnership, while the GRPP faces opportunities and tensions in responding to legislative audits and expanding its role beyond evaluation to support program implementation and policy adaptation. This case study advances theoretical and practical knowledge on sustaining mature, equitable GRPPs that promote evidence-based policymaking, continuous program improvement, and knowledge mobilization in complex governmental contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42678626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.