Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678626›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026

Strengthening School Safety Through Governmental Research-Practice Partnerships: the Arizona School Safety Program.

Sarah Lindstrom Johnson, Brooke Johnson, Ana Briones, Catharina Johnson, Kevin Mach, Andrei Neag, Alexis Mostoller, Sue A Rodríguez de Jesús, Emine Ozturk, Daniel Sanchez and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah Lindstrom JohnsonResearch Team at Arizona State University, Tempe, USA. sarahlj@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4550-1162
Brooke JohnsonResearch Team at Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Ana BrionesResearch Team at Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Catharina JohnsonImplementation Team at the Arizona, Department of Education, Phoenix, USA.
Kevin MachImplementation Team at the Arizona, Department of Education, Phoenix, USA.
Andrei NeagImplementation Team at the Arizona, Department of Education, Phoenix, USA.
Alexis MostollerResearch Team at Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Sue A Rodríguez de JesúsResearch Team at Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Emine OzturkResearch Team at Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Daniel SanchezResearch Team at Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
William WalkerImplementation Team at the Arizona, Department of Education, Phoenix, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Government research-practice partnerships (GRPPs) can bridge the gap between empirical research and policy implementation. However, it remains unclear precisely how state-level governmental agencies navigate evidence-based policymaking. The ongoing collaboration between the Arizona Department of Education and the research team at Arizona State University began as a need for an annual evaluation of the School Safety Program, which aims to improve school safety by providing funding and training to school resource officers and school mental health professionals throughout the state. Unique to this relationship is the structure of the power dynamics between the university and the state. Specifically, this partnership inverts the typical arrangement in which the research team traditionally controls funding, deadlines, and data access. This partnership exemplifies how GRPPs can bridge research and policy by integrating collaborative evaluation frameworks and co-created logic models that serve as boundary objects, facilitating shared language, trust, and sustained engagement across organizational boundaries. The manuscript details operational challenges, including navigating divergent institutional timelines, complex data governance, and dissemination demands, while highlighting mutual capacity-building that enhances both research rigor and policy relevance. Perspectives from both government and academic partners underscore the bidirectional benefits of the partnership, while the GRPP faces opportunities and tensions in responding to legislative audits and expanding its role beyond evaluation to support program implementation and policy adaptation. This case study advances theoretical and practical knowledge on sustaining mature, equitable GRPPs that promote evidence-based policymaking, continuous program improvement, and knowledge mobilization in complex governmental contexts.

Indexed as

EvaluationResearch-practice partnershipSchool safety

Identifiers

PMID42678626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.