ReviewApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026
Evaluating the Efficacy of Biofeedback in Pain Management and Rehabilitation of Sports Injuries: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness of biofeedback interventions for pain management and rehabilitation outcomes in athletes and individuals with sports-related injuries. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. A systematic literature search was conducted in eight electronic databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Searches were completed in September 2024 and updated in November 2025. Randomized controlled trials investigating the use of biofeedback interventions for pain management and rehabilitation in athletes or individuals with sports-related injuries were eligible for inclusion. Due to heterogeneity in participant characteristics, injury types, biofeedback modalities, and outcome measures, a narrative synthesis was performed. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Nine randomized controlled trials from Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Canada, Romania, Brazil, and Iran were included. Biofeedback interventions addressed patellofemoral pain, shoulder impingement, chronic ankle instability, plantar fasciitis, post-traumatic osteoarthritis, chronic low back pain, meniscal injuries, and other musculoskeletal sports injuries. Modalities included electromyography, heart rate variability, neurofeedback, virtual reality feedback, and real-time visual gait retraining. Biofeedback was associated with reduced pain, improved muscle activation and strength, enhanced functional recovery, and better rehabilitation outcomes. Biofeedback may be a valuable adjunct to conventional rehabilitation for athletes or individuals with sports-related injuries. For clinicians, it can enhance neuromuscular control, patient engagement, and functional outcomes in multimodal programs. However, the certainty of the evidence is low, and further high-quality trials across diverse populations are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42678619What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.