Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678618›Full record

Observational studyLasers in medical science2026

The role of bipolar radiofrequency in the treatment of vaginal laxity: a single-center cohort study in premenopausal women.

Pablo González Isaza, Diana Velez, Manuela Cerón, Mary Ríos, Diana Carolina Bermúdez, Jahir Alexander Soto-Mora

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pablo González IsazaSoranus Center for Aesthetic and Functional Urogynecology, Pereira, Colombia. pagonza@hotmail.com.
Diana VelezSoranus Center for Aesthetic and Functional Urogynecology, Pereira, Colombia.
Manuela CerónSoranus Center for Aesthetic and Functional Urogynecology, Pereira, Colombia.
Mary RíosClinical Research Unit, ESE University Hospital San Jorge Pereira, Pereira, Colombia.
Diana Carolina BermúdezODDS Epidemiology, Bogota, Colombia.
Jahir Alexander Soto-MoraODDS Epidemiology, Bogota, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaginal laxity is a prevalent condition that can impair sexual function. Bipolar radiofrequency (RF) is a minimally invasive treatment; however, prospective evidence remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate changes in both subjective and objective measures of vaginal laxity following bipolar RF. This prospective observational study enrolled premenopausal women with symptomatic vaginal laxity who received four intravaginal bipolar RF sessions. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to 6 months in the Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire score. The secondary outcomes included change in genital hiatus area assessed by transperineal ultrasound, vaginal flatus frequency, vaginal laxity bother, sexual function, sexual distress, and patient-reported global improvement. Analyses were performed using paired Student t tests for genital hiatus and Friedman tests for repeated measures for patient-reported outcomes, with corresponding effect sizes reported. Thirty-two women completed follow-up. VLQ scores increased from a median of 2.0 at baseline to 4.0 at 6 months (p < 0.001). Regarding the secondary objective outcome, mean GH area decreased from 21.4 cm

Indexed as

Radiofrequency TherapySexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalVaginaVaginal DiseasesAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPremenopauseProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBipolar radiofrequencyObservational studyPelvic floorSexual functionVaginal laxity

Identifiers

PMID42678618
PMCPMC13534185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.