ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Associations of neighborhood deprivation with breast cancer tumor genomics, targeted treatment use, and survival.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNeighborhood environments appear to influence breast cancer biology and outcomes. This study evaluated somatic, treatment, and outcome differences by Area Deprivation Index in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
methodsRetrospective, population-based cohort study using clinical and genomic data gathered between 2015 and 2024 at four academic institutions in the United States. The outcomes were differences in circulating tumor DNA mutation profiles, PI3K inhibitor use, and survival between patients with metastatic breast cancer living in high deprivation (Area Deprivation Index ≥ 60 by national rank) and low deprivation (< 60) neighborhoods.
resultsAmong 1127 patients with metastatic breast cancer, 335 (29.7%) lived in high deprivation areas. These patients were more likely to have TP53 mutations (Odds ratio 1.49, 95% Confidence Interval 1.07-2.08, P = 0.018). Among hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative patients eligible for PI3K inhibitors, those from high deprivation areas were less likely to receive them (17.4% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.02). Median survival from the time of circulating tumor DNA testing was significantly shorter in the high deprivation group (24 months versus 28 months, p = 0.04) and for Black patients in the high deprivation group versus Black patients in low deprivation group and all White patients (15 months versus 25-28 months, p = 0.02).
conclusionsWe found that patients with metastatic breast cancer living in high deprivation neighborhoods were more likely to have TP53 mutations, an indicator of aggressive disease biology, less likely to receive PI3K inhibitors, and had shorter overall survival compared to patients living in low deprivation neighborhoods by Area Deprivation Index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.