ArticlePsychological research2026
Temporal redistribution of control reveals age-related differences in task switching at the level of preparation.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Task-switching studies often report minimal age-related differences in switch costs, leading to the conclusion that switching-related control processes are relatively preserved in aging. However, this conclusion is based on paradigms that confound preparatory and execution processes. This study examined whether age-related differences in semantic task-set reconfiguration may be underestimated due to this confound. In Experiment 1 (36 young and 30 older adults), participants performed an externally paced task-switching paradigm without control over preparation. In Experiment 2 (28 young and 28 older adults), a self-paced paradigm allowed participants to initiate stimulus onset, enabling measurement of preparation time. Across both experiments, reaction time (RT) and error rate (ER) showed reliable age effects but no interactions between age and condition, whereas switching-related condition effects varied across measures and experiments. The expression of switching-related costs differed across measures and task structures. Local switch costs were expressed in ER in Experiment 1 but in RT in Experiment 2. Global switch costs (all-switch vs. all-repeat) were observed in execution measures only in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, preparation time showed reliable mixing, local, and global switching effects, with age-related amplification emerging specifically for global switching. These findings indicate that switching-related costs are redistributed across processing stages and behavioral measures. The results suggest that age-related modulation of semantic task-set reconfiguration may emerge more clearly during preparation than task execution, particularly under continuous switching demands. Preparation time is interpreted cautiously as reflecting participant-regulated preparatory processes rather than a pure measure of preparation efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42678576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.