Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678546›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2026

[The oregis IVOM registry-Introduction of a registry for the systematic documentation of representative IVOM treatment data from routine treatment of macular diseases in Germany].

Ildikó Piszár, Anais Buhl, Argyrios Chronopoulos, Lukas Schloesser, Christopher Dicke, Nicole Eter, Julian Alexander Zimmermann, oregis, Robert P Finger

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ildikó PiszárAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5627-7127
Anais BuhlAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Argyrios ChronopoulosAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Lukas SchloesserAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Christopher Dickeoregis, DOG Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft e. V., Platenstr. 1, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Nicole EterKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Domagkstr. 15, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
Julian Alexander ZimmermannKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Domagkstr. 15, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
oregis
Robert P FingerAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. RobertPatrick.Finger@umm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravitreal operative medication injection (IVOM) treatment in routine clinical practice often fails to achieve the treatment outcomes demonstrated in clinical trials. In Germany, comprehensive and representative real-world data on IVOM treatment (IVT) for macular diseases are still lacking.

objectiveAgainst this background the oregis IVOM registry was established as a subregistry of the national oregis registry. The aim is the standardized collection and analysis of the course of IVOM treatment in the clinical routine in Germany, to evaluate long-term outcomes and identify potential areas for optimizing patient care. In this way participating ophthalmological centers can make an active contribution to the evidence-based development of IVOM treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe oregis IVOM registry is a prospective, noninterventional observational study. Medical routine care data of adult patients receiving IVOM treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or choroidal neovascularization (CNV) are collected. Data acquisition is performed via web-based remote data entry into an electronic database using REDCap. Registry structure, datasets and data collection parameters are aligned with the international Fight Retinal Blindness! registry.

conclusionThe oregis IVOM registry provides, for the first time, a nationwide structured platform for the systematic collection and evaluation of real-world IVT data in Germany. It closes an important evidence gap in health services research for IVOM treatment in Germany and enables regional and international comparisons as well as analyses of treatment adherence and real-world care.

Indexed as

GermanyIntravitreal injectionsMacular diseasesReal-world dataRegistry study

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.