ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Postpartum Sexual Function in Women with Intrapartum Pelvic Floor Muscle Trauma.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisSexual dysfunction in postpartum women is common, yet the impact of intrapartum pelvic floor trauma (PFT) on domain-specific sexual recovery remains unclear, and pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) referral patterns in this population are poorly characterized. This study compared postpartum sexual function trajectories from 2 to 6 months in women with and without intrapartum PFT and examined PFPT referral and utilization.
methodsParticipants were recruited from Midwest hospitals in the USA at discharge, postpartum visits, and well-baby checkups. Eligibility required age ≥18, vaginal delivery, English fluency, internet access, and follow-up availability. Women with ≥ grade 2 perineal tears were classified as having PFT. Baseline and follow-up surveys included the Carol Scale and FSFI-9, with Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests used for analyses.
resultsEighty-six women (45 PFT, 41 no-PFT) completed both timepoints. Overall sexual function, lubrication readiness, and vulvar caressing discomfort improved (all p ≤ .020), whereas libido worsened (p = 0.009). Penetration-related pain did not change. Groups did not differ at baseline; at follow-up, women with PFT reported poorer overall function, lubrication, penetration pain, and post-activity pain (p = 0.020 to 0.041). Recovery trajectories were parallel, with the only difference in change magnitude being greater improvement in intercourse pain in the PFT group (p = 0.039). Among participants reporting PFPT access, only 33.9% were both referred and seen; 86.9% of those who received PFPT reported symptom improvement.
conclusionsWomen with PFT carried a higher residual symptom burden at 6 months, despite recovery trajectories parallel to those without PFT. Penetration-related pain was the most persistent symptom. Low PFPT referral rates represent a critical and actionable care gap. Postpartum sexual health assessments should include domain-specific screening for penetration-related discomfort and libido, with proactive follow-up for women with PFT and early referral to PFPT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42678515What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.