Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678481›Full record

ReviewBioresources and bioprocessing2026

Process intensification for the protein production from microalgae: a comprehensive review.

Arijit Nath, Abubakar Saleh Ahmad, Munkhnasan Enkhbold, Fatma Elzhraa, Gabriella Kiskó

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arijit NathDepartment of Food Process Engineering, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ménesi st 44, Budapest, HU-1118, Hungary. arijit0410@gmail.com.
Abubakar Saleh AhmadDepartment of Food Process Engineering, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ménesi st 44, Budapest, HU-1118, Hungary.
Munkhnasan EnkhboldDepartment of Food Process Engineering, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ménesi st 44, Budapest, HU-1118, Hungary.
Fatma ElzhraaDepartment of Food Hygiene, Safety, and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mansoura University, El-Gomhoria street, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Gabriella KiskóDepartment of Food Microbiology, Hygiene and Safety, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Somlói St 14-16, Budapest, HU-1118, Hungary. Kisko.Gabriella@uni-mate.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3344-5308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microalgae (predominantly unicellular photosynthetic eukaryotes) has been recognized as a "protein bio-factory" because they may produce up to 70% of protein (dry basis). Advantageous aspects of proteins from microalgae compared to conventional animal- and plant-based proteins were proven. Numerous review articles have addressed the effects of composition of cultivation medium and operational parameters to obtain high protein yield from microalgae. Nevertheless, several critical limitations remain for the industrial expansions of the production of proteins from microalgae. Presently, process intensification is considered a strategic approach for the scalable production of proteins from microalgae, achieved by implementing mutagenic and recombinant strains, increasing productivity through high-cell-density cultivation strategies, using cold-adapted microalgae and minimizing equipment footprint via integrating multiple unit operations into a more efficient and compact system. Different strategies of random mutagenesis (chemical: ethyl methane sulfonate-mediated, physical: heavy-ion irradiation-mediated and ultraviolet-mediated) have been employed to get the desired phenotype of microalgae for higher protein yield. Emerging genetic engineering approaches, including the design of expression vectors, identification of genetic regulatory elements, and genetic transformation methods, along with bioinformatics algorithms, have been employed to develop recombinant strains of microalgae with higher protein yield. Combined cultivation systems, such as sequential heterotrophic-autotrophic system, switching of nitrogen-rich cultivation medium from nitrogen-deficient medium and mixotrophic system have come to the forefront. In this review article, process intensification strategies for the production of proteins from microalgae are comprehensively discussed, with special emphasis on the development of mutant and recombinant strains, strategies of cultivation and decisive operational parameters of bioreactor operation.

Indexed as

Mutant phenotypeOperating parametersOperational strategy of cultivationProcess intensificationProtein from microalgaeRecombinant strain

Identifiers

PMID42678481
PMCPMC13534408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.