Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678469›Full record

ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026

Probiotics as Potential Enhancers of Veterinary Vaccines.

Miriam Angulo, Carlos Angulo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miriam AnguloImmunology & Vaccinology Group and Laboratorio Nacional CONAHCYT (SECIHTI) de Generación de Vacunas Veterinarias y Servicios de Diagnóstico (LNC-GVD), Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C., Instituto Politécnico Nacional 195, Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur, B.C. S. C.P., La Paz, 23096, México.
Carlos AnguloImmunology & Vaccinology Group and Laboratorio Nacional CONAHCYT (SECIHTI) de Generación de Vacunas Veterinarias y Servicios de Diagnóstico (LNC-GVD), Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C., Instituto Politécnico Nacional 195, Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur, B.C. S. C.P., La Paz, 23096, México. eangulo@cibnor.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral, bacterial, and parasitic diseases in food-producing and companion animals are permanent problems for humankind. Research to solve this concern includes those based on modulation of the immune system, such as probiotic supplementation and vaccination. Vaccines are a cheap alternative to prevent and control diseases, while probiotics provide several health benefits to the host, including immunostimulation. Research on unified strategies has been scarcely explored, but the current results evidence that probiotics can serve as potentiators of vaccines. Yeast and bacterial probiotic supplementation, mono- or multi-species and before or after vaccination, among other assessments, in ruminants, equines, swine, poultry, fish, and dogs, against bacterial, viral and/or parasitic infections has revealed increased immune responses and, in a few studies, protective outcomes. Therefore, this review aimed to describe those scientific findings and discuss their limitations and implications for the use of probiotics as vaccine enhancers in veterinary species. Through the modulation of innate and adaptive immune responses, probiotic usage may also expand opportunities for the development of potential vaccine enhancers in veterinary medicine.

Indexed as

Beneficial microorganismsCompanion animalsFarm animalsImmunomodulatorsTrained immunity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.