ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026
Outcome-Adaptive Lasso for Cox Proportional Hazards Model.
Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While randomized controlled trials remain the gold standard for estimating causal effects in medical research, they are not always practical. Consequently, observational data become a necessary alternative, though it introduces confounding bias due to the lack of randomization. Propensity score modeling mitigates this bias but is highly sensitive to covariate selection. To address this critical limitation in survival analysis, we propose the outcome-adaptive Lasso (OAL)-Cox model-a novel variable selection framework for causal inference for right-censored data. The proposed method integrates the OAL with the Cox proportional hazards model by constructing penalty weights from coefficients estimated through the Cox partial likelihood. This design enables OAL-Cox to effectively identify outcome-related confounders while excluding irrelevant covariates, including instrumental and spurious variables, even under censoring and correlated covariate structures. Simulation studies demonstrate that OAL-Cox achieves stable variable selection across different censoring rates and correlation settings. Compared with the L-Cox and AL-Cox methods considered in this study, OAL-Cox more effectively reduces the inclusion of instrumental and spurious covariates while retaining outcome-related covariates, and it generally yields more stable restricted mean survival time-based causal effect estimates in the examined settings. We further illustrate the practical applicability of the proposed method by applying it to ovarian cancer recurrence time data to evaluate the effect of surgical sophistication on recurrence time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.