Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678294›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2026

Simulation-Based Evaluation of Busulfan Sampling Strategies in Adults and Adolescents Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Zhiyuan Tan, Federica R Achini-Gutzwiller, Arjan C Lankester, Joost G K van der Hem, Peter A von dem Borne, Dirk Jan A R Moes, Tim Preijers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhiyuan TanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-6932
Federica R Achini-GutzwillerDepartment of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arjan C LankesterDepartment of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joost G K van der HemDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter A von dem BorneDepartment of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dirk Jan A R MoesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3219-253X
Tim PreijersDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Rotterdam Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6953-0358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Busulfan, used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, exhibits a narrow therapeutic index and high pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is currently employed to achieve target exposure. However, there is no consensus on an optimal limited sampling strategy (LSS) for busulfan on the once-daily (QD) regimen. A virtual cohort of adult patients (n = 1000) receiving OD intravenous busulfan 3.2 mg/kg as a 3-h infusion was generated by Monte Carlo simulation using three published busulfan population PK models. For each one- and two-sample LSS, individual PK parameters were estimated from Day-1 sample(s) by maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation and used to estimate the 4-day cumulative AUC. A model-informed precision-dosing (MIPD) analysis quantified the target-attainment benefit of TDM per design. The best-performing designs were validated in an external cohort (n = 37) with adults and adolescents. Across all three models, a two-sample early-plus-late schedule was the most informative, and the recommended two-sample design was 3 and 7 h after the start of infusion. TDM guided by a well-chosen LSS approximately doubled cumulative-target attainment, whereas a single early 3-h sample was markedly weaker. In the external cohort, two-sample designs recovered the cumulative 4-day AUC to ∼5%-8% MAPE versus ∼11%-13% for a single 3-h sample. For OD intravenous busulfan in adults and adolescents, a two-sample schedule at 3 and 7 h after the start of infusion supports the correct dosing decision and, through MIPD-guided dose adjustment, approximately doubles target attainment; a single 6-h sample is a simpler but less robust alternative.

Indexed as

BusulfanDrug MonitoringHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationImmunosuppressive AgentsModels, BiologicalAdolescentAdultArea Under CurveBayes TheoremComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodTransplantation, HomologousBusulfanImmunosuppressive Agentsbusulfanhematopoietic stem cell transplantationlimited sampling strategymodel‐informed precision dosingoptimal design

Identifiers

PMID42678294
PMCPMC13532598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.