Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678224›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Natural History of Macular Sensitivity in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy: Microperimetry-Derived Outcome Measures in Preparation For Clinical Trials.

Lorenzo Bianco, Giovanni Forte, Alessio Antropoli, Sebastiano Del Fabbro, Gabriella Doddato, Silvia Calzavara, Giovanni Scalabrin, Rebecca Toscani, Rebecca Melenchi, Adelaide Pina and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07265895 (Inherited Retinal Diseases), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07265895 not yet recruitingnot on this map

Inherited Retinal Diseases: Natural History and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations, Monocentric Retrospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2026 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsRetinal Degenerations, Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP), Stargardt DiseaseArmsNo Intervention: Observational Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lorenzo BiancoDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni ForteDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alessio AntropoliDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Sebastiano Del FabbroDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Gabriella DoddatoUOC Medical Genetics, Molecular Genetics and Cytogenetics, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Silvia CalzavaraUOC Medical Genetics, Molecular Genetics and Cytogenetics, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni ScalabrinDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Rebecca ToscaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Rebecca MelenchiSchool of Medicine, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Adelaide PinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro ArrigoDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BandelloDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Sabrina Rita GiglioSchool of Medicine, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Maria Vittoria CicinelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio Battaglia ParodiDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize the longitudinal changes of macular sensitivity in best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and explore microperimetry (MP)-derived outcome measures for clinical trials. Methods: Natural history cohort study (IRDs-OSR, NCT07265895) on subjects with BVMD undergoing mesopic MP (68-point grid, central 10°; MAIA, CenterVue). Test points were classified relative to normative data as normal (P ≥ 5%), relative scotoma (P < 5%, sensitivity ≥ 1dB), or deep scotoma (sensitivity <1 dB). Per-eye annual rates of change (RoC) of mean sensitivity (MS) were computed globally and within point subsets, together with point counts. Results: Twenty-three eyes of 13 patients with clinical BVMD, with a median age at baseline of 29.4 years, completed an average of three tests over a median of 4.4 years. The median MS at baseline was 21.4 dB, with 44% of points being normal, 54% relative scotomas, and 2% deep scotomas. Globally MS showed no significant decline (mean RoC = -0.16 dB/year; P = 0.21). Restricting analysis to normal points at baseline revealed small but significant decline (mean RoC = -0.36 dB/year; P = 0.006), steepest within 5° (mean RoC = -0.56 dB/year; P = 0.028). Average increase of deep scotoma points was ∼1 every five years (mean RoC = 0.22 points/year; P = 0.015), with no significant change in relative scotoma or normal point counts (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: Macular sensitivity within the central 10° remained stable over four years in BVMD when averaged across several test points, reflecting the disease slow natural history. Restricting analysis to normal points unmasked measurable decline, which may serve as an MP-derived outcome measure for gene therapy trials.

Indexed as

Macula LuteaScotomaVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsVitelliform Macular DystrophyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42678224
PMCPMC13549402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.