ArticleTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences2026
Integrated Botanical and Phytochemical Characterization of
Article in Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Materials and Methods: In this experimental laboratory study, the morphological and anatomical characteristics of the aerial parts were examined using standard pharmacognostic, histological, and scanning electron microscopic methods. The essential oil was obtained by hydrodistillation, and the methanolic extract was prepared by maceration with 90% methanol. Volatile constituents were analyzed by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, while phenolic compounds were identified and quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Preliminary antimicrobial activity was screened against five bacterial and two fungal strains using the agar well diffusion method. Results: The plant exhibited characteristic xeromorphic features, including amphistomatic and isobilateral leaves, multilayered palisade parenchyma, anomocytic stomata, and dense non-glandular trichomes. The essential oil yield was 0.46%, and 33 volatile constituents were identified. Artemisia ketone (55.96%) and camphor (20.84%) were the major components. The methanolic extract yield was 14.40%, with chlorogenic acid (6733.85 μg/g dry extract) and quinic acid (6521.37 μg/g dry extract) identified as the predominant quantified compounds. The extract showed its strongest antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, with inhibition zones of 8.00, 11.00, and 11.66 mm at concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 mg/mL, respectively. More limited activity was observed against Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.