Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678152›Full record

ArticlemSphere2026

The distribution of acidophilic iron oxidizers is consistent with environmental filtering, dispersal limitation, and competition.

Christen L Grettenberger, Caden Williams, Trinity L Hamilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christen L GrettenbergerDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6323-5179
Caden WilliamsDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Trinity L HamiltonDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2282-4655

Funding

National Science Foundation 2345568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acid mine drainage (AMD) is a global pollution problem characterized by low pH and high concentrations of metals. Active remediation is often cost-prohibitive, but Fe(II)-oxidizing microbes may be used for passive bioremediation. To leverage these species, we must understand the factors that control their distribution. Here, we examined the environmental and ecological factors that control these species with the aim of determining if microbial seeding is a viable remediation strategy. Although stochastic processes appeared to control the distribution of the majority of taxa inhabiting AMD ecosystems, the distribution of Fe(II) oxidizers appeared to be driven by environmental filtering and competition. The abundance of all the major Fe(II)-oxidizing genera had significant relationships with pH, with pH explaining 10%-38% of the variation in their abundance. The genera appeared to have pH preferences, with IMPORTANCE: Acid mine drainage (AMD) is a global pollution problem affecting streams worldwide. One method of remediating AMD is by using naturally occurring microbial communities to remove iron and other metals. However, we do not have a complete understanding of the factors that control the distribution of these species or if it is possible to seed species from one environment into another. Here, we examine the factors that control community assembly in AMD ecosystems. We find that individual species appear to be dispersal-limited; thus, microbial seeding may be a viable method for AMD remediation.

Indexed as

BacteriaIronAcidsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEcosystemHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMiningOxidation-ReductionAcidsIronacid mine drainagemicrobial ecologyneutral model

Identifiers

PMID42678152
PMCPMC13621859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.