Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678137›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Individual differences drive social hierarchies in male mouse societies.

Jonathan Reinwald, Sarah Ghanayem, David Wolf, Max Scheller, Julia Lebedeva, Philipp Lebhardt, Oliver Gölz, Corentin Nelias, Wolfgang Kelsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan Reinwald *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9508-3942
Sarah Ghanayem *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
David WolfDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1566-1237
Max SchellerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Julia LebedevaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3874-9549
Philipp LebhardtDepartment of Clinical Health Technologies, Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation, Fraunhofer Society, Mannheim, Germany.
Oliver GölzDepartment of Clinical Health Technologies, Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation, Fraunhofer Society, Mannheim, Germany.
Corentin NeliasDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-5575
Wolfgang KelschDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-8125

Funding

BMBF CRCNS grant 'Oxystate' 01GQ1708Boehringer Ingelheim Stiftung Complex SystemsBundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt 161L0277ABundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt 16LW0333KDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC 379 Project C03Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EB187/8-1Leibniz-Gemeinschaft K430/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social hierarchies structure groups and confer advantages on high-ranking individuals. In mice, individual position in hierarchies may emerge situationally from current group compositions, or, alternatively, may remain largely stable across groups as an internalized feature. Dominance and subordination are expressed in behaviors like tube competitions or agonistic chasing. The interaction of these behaviors in the shaping of social position in larger male mouse groups remains largely unknown. To address these questions, we developed the NoSeMaze, a semi-naturalistic, open-source, modular platform that enables automated long-term tracking of unperturbed groups. Across more than 4000 mouse-days, hierarchies derived from incidental competitions in the integrated tube tests were non-despotic, transitive, and stable even when group compositions changed. This stability supports an internalized component of competition-based social rank. Chasing was also stable across contexts. Notably, chasing was concentrated among high-ranking individuals, consistent with ongoing negotiation of social rank among individuals at the upper end of the hierarchy. The link between chasing and social rank strengthened in groups with less well-defined rank structure, where mice rely more on aggressive signaling to assert their position. Chasing and social rank were associated with certain dimensions of simultaneously measured physical and cognitive features. In summary, high-dimensional tracking with the NoSeMaze reveals that social position in mice is multifaceted and shaped by stable dimensions of individual behavior that persist across changing social contexts. The approach thus enables longitudinal modeling of individuality and social position as key resilience factors.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalHierarchy, SocialIndividualitySocial BehaviorAnimalsMaleMiceSocial Dominancechasingcomputational biologyhomecage monitoringindividualitymouseneurosciencesocial hierarchysocial statussubordinationsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID42678137
PMCPMC13533481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.