ArticleeLife2026
Individual differences drive social hierarchies in male mouse societies.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rodent models of aggression: from mechanisms to clinical translation.Der Nervenarzt · 2026Review
- Stable clique membership in male mouse societies requires oxytocin-enabled social sensory states.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social hierarchies structure groups and confer advantages on high-ranking individuals. In mice, individual position in hierarchies may emerge situationally from current group compositions, or, alternatively, may remain largely stable across groups as an internalized feature. Dominance and subordination are expressed in behaviors like tube competitions or agonistic chasing. The interaction of these behaviors in the shaping of social position in larger male mouse groups remains largely unknown. To address these questions, we developed the NoSeMaze, a semi-naturalistic, open-source, modular platform that enables automated long-term tracking of unperturbed groups. Across more than 4000 mouse-days, hierarchies derived from incidental competitions in the integrated tube tests were non-despotic, transitive, and stable even when group compositions changed. This stability supports an internalized component of competition-based social rank. Chasing was also stable across contexts. Notably, chasing was concentrated among high-ranking individuals, consistent with ongoing negotiation of social rank among individuals at the upper end of the hierarchy. The link between chasing and social rank strengthened in groups with less well-defined rank structure, where mice rely more on aggressive signaling to assert their position. Chasing and social rank were associated with certain dimensions of simultaneously measured physical and cognitive features. In summary, high-dimensional tracking with the NoSeMaze reveals that social position in mice is multifaceted and shaped by stable dimensions of individual behavior that persist across changing social contexts. The approach thus enables longitudinal modeling of individuality and social position as key resilience factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.