ArticleActa odontologica latinoamericana : AOL2026
Compressive strength of endodontically treated mandibularpremolars rehabilitated with three techniques.
Article in Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biomechanical rehabilitation of endodontically treated premolars with extensive mesio-occlusodistal (MOD) cavities is a clinical challenge due to their increased susceptibility to fracture.
aimTo compare the compressive strength of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored using different post-endodontic reconstruction protocols, using intact teeth as a reference for maximum mechanical performance. MATERIALS AND
methodForty single-rooted premolars were distributed into four groups: one control group with no interventions, and three experimental groups with standardized mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) preparations. Experimental groups were restored respectively with core buildup, glass fiber posts, and polyethylene fiber reinforcement. After final composite resin restoration, specimens were tested for compressive strength using an INSTRON 1011 universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05).
resultsWhen examining median (95%CI) compressive strength in Newtons (N), the highest value was found in the control group with 557.4 N (100.8-574.8), followed by the polyethylene fiber group with 471.4 N (194.2 to 565.5), the glass fiber posts group with 427.5 N (146.3 to 495.4) and the core buildup group with 345.1 N (216.8 to 574.9), (p = 0.84).
conclusionUnder the experimental conditions of the present study, the compressive strength of endodontically treated mandibular premolars did not differ significantly among the evaluated reconstruction protocols. Although polyethylene fiber reinforcement showed a tendency toward higher resistance values, the results do not enable the establishment of conclusive mechanical advantages among the restorative systems assessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.