ArticleMedical education online2026
Assessing digital health curriculum needs: a mixed-methods study of student and faculty perspectives in a Singapore medical school.
Article in Medical education online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid advancement of digital technologies has transformed healthcare delivery, creating an imperative for medical education to integrate digital health (DH) competencies into undergraduate training. Despite growing recognition of its importance, progress in embedding DH literacy within formal medical curricula has been uneven and slow.
objectiveThis study examined DH education within an undergraduate medical programme by integrating faculty and student perspectives to identify curriculum development needs and inform evidence-based educational strategies.
designA mixed-methods study was conducted at a Singapore medical school offering a 5-year undergraduate curriculum. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four faculty members as DH content experts, exploring curriculum design, pedagogical strategies, and competency expectations. A 24-item survey assessing knowledge, attitudes, and usage of DH tools was administered to students across pre-clinical and clinical training, with 131 responses from 848 eligible participants. Qualitative data were analysed using grounded theory-based thematic analysis, whilst survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics.
resultsFaculty interviews identified three key themes: curriculum gaps requiring more practical and clinically-oriented DH teaching, structural barriers including time constraints and rapid technological change, and complex stakeholder ecosystem influencing curriculum development. Student survey results revealed a persistent theory-practice gap across DH domains. Students reported high self-perceived knowledge in DH applications and artificial intelligence (AI) but consistently lower confidence in practical application, particularly in electronic health records (EHR) and telemedicine. Clinical students paradoxically rated their EHR knowledge lowest despite greater clinical exposure. Students expressed strong interest in programming, data analytics, and hands-on AI, favouring applied DH skills with direct clinical relevance.
conclusionsMedical curricula struggle to translate DH conceptual knowledge into practice, reconcile divergent competency expectations between students and faculty, and remain current amid rapid technological change. Tiered competency models, coupled with experiential learning approaches and continuous faculty development, represent a promising strategy for preparing future physicians for digitally enhanced healthcare delivery. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.