Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42677986›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2026

Comparison of Ultrasonographic and Computed Tomographic Features of Parathyroid Glands in Canine Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

Charles Neill, Séamus Hoey, Eimear Shorten, Francisco Llabres-Diaz, Thomas W Maddox, Julie Besson, Benoît Cuq

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charles NeillSection of Equine Medicine, Anaesthesia and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9072-3453
Séamus HoeySection of Equine Medicine, Anaesthesia and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1049-7658
Eimear ShortenSection of Equine Medicine, Anaesthesia and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8295-008X
Francisco Llabres-DiazDiagnostic Imaging Department, Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3966-1642
Thomas W MaddoxDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Science, School of Veterinary Science, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-5040
Julie BessonDiagnostic Imaging Service, AzurVet Centre de Vétérinaires Spécialistes, St-Laurent-du-Var, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2445-5491
Benoît CuqSection of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-3625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multicenter retrospective study compared ultrasonographic (US) and computed tomographic (CT) characteristics of parathyroid glands in 20 dogs with histopathological confirmation of primary hyperparathyroidism. Twenty-four glands were diseased (17 adenomas and 7 hyperplastic glands). Two blinded radiologists assessed US and CT studies in two readings. A similar total number of glands was visualized (US 59 and CT 63). Intermodality agreement for identification of the same individual glands was slight for presumed normal glands but perfect for diseased glands, with 23 of 24 diseased glands visualized on both modalities. Glands were more often poorly marginated on CT compared to US, whereas other descriptive features were similar across modalities. The only shared feature of diseased glands on both modalities was significantly greater size. Intermodality agreement for size measurements was poor for presumed normal glands, with CT measuring larger, but moderate to good for diseased glands. Intermodality agreement for classifying glands as enlarged (largest dimension ≥4 mm) was substantial. Enlargement-based localization sensitivity for diseased glands was similar between modalities (US 18/24, 75.0%; CT 19/24, 79.2%). Additional enlarged glands without histopathological confirmation of disease were identified in three instances on US and seven on CT. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for quantitative parameters was similar between modalities; however, agreement for most descriptive parameters was superior on US. Overall, US likely remains the first-line imaging modality for localizing parathyroid disease; however, these findings support selective incorporation of CT to aid therapeutic decision-making in canine primary hyperparathyroidism.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesHyperparathyroidism, PrimaryParathyroid GlandsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyAdenomaAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleRetrospective Studiescervical imagingdogshypercalcemiaparathyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID42677986
PMCPMC13531724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.