ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Exploring the Feasibility of Appreciative Inquiry on Job Satisfaction of Intensive Care Nurses: A Mixed-Method Study.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe increasing nursing attrition rate has become a major concern. Job satisfaction is a key predictor of nurse turnover, yet the effectiveness of strength-based approaches remains underexplored. This study aimed to explore the feasibility and preliminary effects of implementing Appreciative Inquiry (AI) on job satisfaction among intensive care unit (ICU) nurses.
methodsFollowing ethical approval, AI using the 5-D cycle was implemented over a five-month period with ICU nurses. The intervention involved a series of sessions designed to explore the nurses' best experiences, core values, and wishes through dialog and inquiry. The Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) was administered pre- and postintervention to assess job satisfaction changes, and focus group interviews were conducted to gather qualitative insights.
resultsSixty-three ICU nurses participated in the study. Quantitative analysis showed no statistically significant increase in general job satisfaction (mean score: 68.8 to 70.0) and intrinsic satisfaction (43.4 to 44.2). However, specific MSQ subitems, particularly those related to receiving praise and sense of accomplishment, showed preliminary improvements (p < 0.05), although these findings are exploratory. Qualitative findings revealed that impactful nursing care often stems from personal interactions, highlighting why nurses find meaning and appreciation in their work. Many participants expressed interests in exploring more appreciative topics, suggesting AI's potential for broader workplace improvement.
conclusionAI is a novel approach within the Hong Kong nursing context. While overall findings did not reach statistical significance, this study suggests AI application within an ICU setting is feasible. The preliminary feedback indicates its potential to enhance staff engagement and targeted aspects of job satisfaction. Further controlled and rigorous research is recommended to explore the AI impact on healthcare environments. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers can practically integrate AI by using strength-based dialog and inquiry to focus on best practices during staff reviews, targeting specific workplace stressors, and implementing structured recognition practices to celebrate staff successes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.