Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42677879›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Deep Learning-Based Intelligent Resource Management for Renewable Energy Engineering Projects.

Yangping Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yangping YaoSchool of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study integrates deep reinforcement learning (DRL) with lean management for renewable energy project scheduling. The problem is formulated as a constrained Markov decision process with weather‑dependent dynamics and a composite reward such as schedule, cost, quality, and constraints. A four‑layer architecture (convolutional, recurrent, and attention layers) and a masked proximal policy optimization actor-critic enhanced with prioritized experience replay and meta-learning learn adaptive policies; four lean principles map directly onto the DRL loop. A three-stage feasibility filter-hard action masking, soft resource rescaling, and penalty fallback-ensures that every executed decision satisfies project-network, resource, weather-window, grid, and environmental constraints. Validation on 186 Northwest China projects shows 33.0% shorter duration, 29.2% lower cost, and 87.2% resource utilization while preserving quality. Compared with eight state-of-the-art deep-learning and classical baselines, the proposed approach delivers an average improvement of approximately 2.9 percentage points in schedule efficiency over the strongest deep‑learning baselines, and reduces mean absolute error by approximately 41%-50% on large‑scale projects (>200 activities). The proposed method retains ∼80% performance under 30% noise and ≥97.8% on CPU‑only hardware, supporting practical adoption by small-to-medium enterprises and on-site project offices.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEngineeringRenewable EnergyChinaHumansMarkov ChainsReinforcement Machine LearningSoft Computingactor–critic optimizationconstrained Markov decision processdeep reinforcement learningintelligent schedulinglean managementrenewable energy engineeringresource optimization

Identifiers

PMID42677879
PMCPMC13531482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.