ReviewWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2026
A Critical Review of Imidacloprid Remediation Technologies for Sustainable Environmental Management.
Review in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imidacloprid (IMI), one of the most extensively used neonicotinoid insecticides, has become a widespread environmental contaminant owing to its high water solubility, persistence, and intensive agricultural applications. Its frequent detection in soil and aquatic environments has raised growing concerns because of its adverse effects on pollinators, aquatic organisms, wildlife, and potential risks to human health. Although numerous remediation technologies have been developed, existing reviews largely focus on individual treatment approaches and provide limited comparative evaluation of their remediation efficiency, mineralization potential, transformation-product toxicity, scalability, and long-term sustainability. This review addresses this gap by critically assessing the physicochemical properties, environmental fate, toxicological impacts, and remediation technologies of IMI. Comparative analysis indicates that electrochemical and advanced oxidation processes generally achieve rapid degradation and superior mineralization; however, their practical implementation is often constrained by energy consumption, catalyst or electrode costs, and uncertainties regarding the toxicity of degradation intermediates. In contrast, adsorption and membrane-based technologies offer rapid and scalable pollutant removal but primarily transfer IMI into secondary waste streams without complete detoxification. Biological and hybrid treatment systems provide environmentally compatible alternatives with lower energy requirements, although slower degradation kinetics, environmental variability, and limited field-scale validation remain significant challenges. Collectively, the evidence suggests that integrated technology can simultaneously maximize removal efficiency, mineralization, cost-effectiveness, and environmental safety for sustainable detoxification and long-term management of IMI-contaminated environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.