ReviewJournal of environmental quality
Vegetated buffer strips for reducing diffused agricultural water pollution in Africa.
Review in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vegetated buffer strips for reducing diffused agricultural water pollution in Africa.Journal of environmental qualityReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Agricultural pollution poses a significant global threat to biodiversity, water quality, and human health, with particularly acute to chronic toxic impacts on living beings in low- and middle-income countries. Vegetated buffer strips (VBSs) are recognized as a cost-effective, nature-based solution for managing agricultural pollution risks. Despite their proven efficacy, the adoption of VBSs remains very limited across African countries. This review provides comprehensive scientific literature to assess VBS effectiveness in mitigating diffuse agricultural water pollution, with a specific focus on its potential for Africa. Out of the initial pool of publications, 35 studies (23.3%) met the inclusion criteria, consistently demonstrating the statistically significant effectiveness of VBSs in reducing non-point source pollution (sediment, particulate, dissolved forms of phosphorus, pesticides, and dissolved nitrogen). Beyond direct pollution control, the review underscores the broader benefits of VBSs, including improved sediment and nutrient management during runoff events, enhanced biodiversity, and contributions to carbon sequestration. The findings highlight a critical need for tailored policy development and robust economic incentives to support VBS implementation in Africa. Successful integration of VBS can be instrumental in achieving the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, particularly in improving food security and water quality across the continent. This work advocates for localized research and collaborative efforts to unlock the full potential of VBS as a sustainable agricultural practice in diverse African contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.