ArticleISME communications2026
Contrasts in niche breadth and its drivers between soil microbes and plants in alpine grasslands.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Niche breadth reflects the extent to which taxa or communities can tolerate environmental variations, indicating their potential to respond to environmental changes. However, it remains unclear whether micro- and macro-organisms share similar patterns of niche breadth along the same environmental gradients, and which environmental filters regulates niche breadth across different trophic levels. In this study, 180 soil samples were collected from the northeastern and central Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. By integrating microbiome sequencing with plant community surveys, we quantified niche breadth for bacteria, fungi, and plants within a multidimensional environmental space defined by principal component analysis of environmental variables. We then compared niche breadth among the three groups and identified their primary environmental drivers. The results showed that fungal communities exhibited the broadest niche breadth overall, whereas plant communities displayed the greatest variability in mean niche breadth amongst sites. Elevation was a shared determinant of niche breadth in all groups, although with contrasting response patterns. Bacterial and fungal communities exhibited broader niche breadths at higher elevations, whereas plant communities reached their maximum niche breadths at mid-elevations, suggesting contrasting adaptive strategies. A combination of abiotic (geography and environment) and biotic (community diversity and composition) factors better explained the variation in niche breadth. In particular, compared with the niche breadth of fungal communities, that of bacterial and plant communities was more strongly regulated by biotic factors such as community composition. We further confirmed that abiotic factors influenced the niche breadth of the three biological groups, both directly and indirectly, by shaping their biotic attributes. From the perspective of niche breadth, this study revealed distinct environmental adaptation patterns and the underlying mechanisms of different biological groups in alpine grassland ecosystems. Better understanding of niche breadth patterns amongst different kingdoms of life may provide improved prediction of turnover and resilience of soil ecosystems under environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.