ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Repositioning candidate gene approaches in the post-GWAS era: a clinical perspective from psychiatric pharmacogenetics.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical adoption of pharmacogenetics has advanced unevenly despite rapid progress in genomic discovery. Genome-wide association studies and next-generation sequencing have substantially improved our understanding of the polygenic and regulatory architecture of complex diseases, yet translating these insights into clinically actionable pharmacogenetic strategies remains challenging. In this opinion article, we argue that targeted genetic approaches, traditionally represented by candidate gene association studies, should be reconsidered within a modern genomic framework. While such approaches proved limited as discovery tools for complex disease risk, they may retain translational value when integrated with genome-wide evidence and multi-omics prioritization. In pharmacogenetics, pathway-focused investigations and targeted validation studies can help bridge the gap between large-scale genomic discovery and clinical implementation. Within this framework, pharmacokinetic pharmacogenes (e.g., CYP2D6, CYP2C19) and pharmacodynamic phenotypes (e.g., treatment response, antipsychotic-induced weight gain) represent fundamentally different translational challenges, differing in effect size, biological complexity, and clinical readiness. We propose that the strategic integration of genome-wide analyses, sequencing, multi-omics data, and hypothesis-driven genetic studies may accelerate the clinical adoption of pharmacogenetics and contribute to more effective precision medicine in psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.