ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2026
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Cryptorchidism is the most common congenital anomaly of the male genitourinary system, characterized by a multifactorial etiology. The disheveled-associated activator of morphogenesis 2 ( Materials and methods: This prospective case-control study included 40 male pediatric cryptorchidism patients and 39 age- and sex-matched healthy male controls. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood. The p.(Asp165Glu) variant was genotyped by TaqMan allelic discrimination and p.(Asn614ThrfsTer2) by ARMS-PCR with melting curve analysis. Genotype distributions were compared using linear-by-linear association testing with exact p-values, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by binary logistic regression. Results: Heterozygous p.N614Tfs*2 carriage was more frequent in cryptorchidism patients (12.5%, n = 5) than in controls (2.6%, n = 1), with an unadjusted OR of 5.43 (95% CI: 0.6048.78, p = 0.131). Heterozygous p.D165E frequency was similar in both groups (7.5% vs. 7.7%; OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.19-5.45, p = 0.974), whereas homozygous p.D165E was identified exclusively in 2 of 40 cryptorchidism patients (5.0%) and in none of the controls, resulting in complete separation in the regression model. Conclusion: Although statistical significance could not be reached due to the limited size of the study group, the observed fivefold increase in heterozygosity of p.(Asn614ThrfsTer2) and the presence of homozygosity of p.(Asp165Glu) in cryptorchidism cases contribute to the literature. These data suggest that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.