ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer (GCIPL) Thickness and Thinning Patterns for Differentiating Glaucomatous and Non-Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness and thinning patterns for differentiating glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) from non-glaucomatous optic neuropathy (NGON) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Patients and Methods: This prospective comparative study included 80 eyes (45 GON, 35 NGON). All participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examination, standard automated perimetry, and SD-OCT imaging. GCIPL, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and optic nerve head parameters were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with disease classification. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: GCIPL thickness was significantly reduced in NGON compared with GON across all parameters (all P < 0.05). In an exploratory multivariable analysis, average GCIPL thickness per standard deviation decrease remained associated with disease classification (OR 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01-1.46; P = 0.038), whereas RNFL thickness did not. Minimum and average GCIPL thickness demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.878 and 0.859), with numerically higher AUCs than average RNFL thickness (AUC 0.759). Pattern analysis showed that GON predominantly exhibited focal or horizontal thinning, whereas NGON demonstrated diffuse or vertical hemispheric thinning. Conclusion: Macular GCIPL analysis provides potentially useful quantitative and pattern-based information for differentiating glaucomatous from non-glaucomatous optic neuropathy. GCIPL findings should be interpreted as an adjunct to the clinical examination, visual field testing, RNFL assessment, and neuroimaging when indicated, rather than as a stand-alone diagnostic test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.