Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42677272›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2026

Measurement of resection volume using computed tomography 3D modeling in lung cancer patients and survival analysis.

Aykut Kankoç, Muhammet Tarık Aslan, Muhammet Sayan, Ali Çelik, İsmail Cüneyt Kurul, Abdullah İrfan Taştepe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aykut KankoçDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-6115
Muhammet Tarık AslanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4123-1131
Muhammet SayanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5402-9031
Ali ÇelikDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5385-6492
İsmail Cüneyt KurulDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9480-010X
Abdullah İrfan TaştepeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2032-7444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: The prognostic significance of the volumetric extent of lung resection in nonsmall cell lung cancer remains uncertain. Three-dimensional computed tomography allows quantitative assessment of resected lung parenchyma, but the relationship between resection volume ratios and oncologic outcomes has not been clearly established. The aim in this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of three-dimensional computed tomography-derived resection volume ratios for disease-free survival after surgery for nonsmall cell lung cancer. Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective study included 141 patients who underwent anatomical resection with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection between 2010 and 2021. Resection volume, ipsilateral lung volume, total lung volume, and derived ratios were calculated from preoperative computed tomography images. The early- and advanced-stage subgroups were analyzed separately. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used when appropriate, whereas median values were used for exploratory survival comparisons when no meaningful threshold was identified. Disease-free survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox's regression analyses. Results: In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, a higher resection-to-total lung volume ratio was associated with better disease-free survival in early-stage disease (75.6% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.015) but worse disease-free survival in advanced-stage disease (25.0% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.009). In the multivariable continuous Cox's analysis, the resection-to-total lung volume ratio was not independently associated with disease-free survival in the early-stage patients. In contrast, in the advanced-stage patients, each 0.1 increase in this ratio was independently associated with worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 4.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-16.12, p = 0.029). No independent association was observed in the pooled multivariable model. Conclusion: The prognostic effect of the resection-to-total lung volume ratio appears to be stage-dependent in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Although favorable unadjusted associations were observed in early-stage disease, these were not confirmed in multivariable continuous analysis. In advanced-stage disease, however, higher values were independently associated with worse disease-free survival.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImaging, Three-DimensionalLung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Analysisnonsmall cell lung cancerSublobar resectionvolumetry

Identifiers

PMID42677272
PMCPMC13528710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.