ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2026
Comparative analysis of corticosteroid injection alone versus combined corticosteroid and radiofrequency ablation for plantar fasciitis: short- and medium-term outcomes.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common cause of heel pain and may lead to functional impairment and reduced quality of life. This study aimed to compare the short- and medium-term clinical outcomes of corticosteroid injection (CSI) alone versus combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and CSI in patients with PF refractory to conservative treatment. Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective comparative study included patients diagnosed with PF between 1 January 2021 and 1 January 2025. Patients who underwent either CSI alone or combined RFA and CSI after failure of conservative management were included. Pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline, 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months. Global perceived effect (GPE) scores were evaluated at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months. Results: Both treatment groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS scores at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months compared to baseline (p < 0.001 for all). Baseline and 1-week VAS scores were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05). However, median VAS scores at 3 and 6 months were significantly lower in the group receiving combined RFA and CSI compared to CSI alone (p < 0.001). GPE scores at 1 week did not differ significantly (p = 0.100), but at 3 and 6 months, they were significantly higher in the combined group (p < 0.001). In adjusted longitudinal analysis, the group receiving combined RFA and CSI had lower overall VAS scores over time, with significant group × time interactions at 3 and 6 months. Conclusion: Both CSI alone and combined RFA and CSI provide significant short- and medium-term pain relief. However, the addition of RFA to CSI is associated with superior midterm pain control and greater patient-reported clinical improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.