ArticleCanadian geriatrics journal : CGJ2026
Barriers and Facilitators in Using Personal Hearing Amplifiers from the Perspective of Healthcare Providers.
Article in Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hearing loss is experienced by two-thirds of hospitalized older adults and is associated with poor access to healthcare and negative health outcomes. Personal hearing amplifiers (PHAs) are evidence-based assistive devices provided in many hospitals to improve accessibility. However, studies note difficulties in implementing the appropriate use of PHAs. This study seeks to identify barriers and facilitators in using PHAs by healthcare providers in an academic hospital. Methods: An ethnographic interview protocol was developed and used to guide voluntary semi-structured interviews with 33 geriatricians, nurses and other allied health professionals, and patient-facing volunteers at Mount Sinai Hospital. The audio interviews were transcribed verbatim and a reflexive thematic analysis was performed. Finally, member checking was completed by sharing results with interviewees who consented to re-contacting and interest-holders within the hospital's geriatrics program to receive feedback. Results: Thematic analysis revealed that regardless of profession, PHAs were perceived as valuable yet underutilized. Under this overarching theme, three key themes were identified around PHA use: barriers to accessibility and availability, lack of designated responsibility, and lack of integration into clinical practice. These findings highlight both the facilitators and barriers associated with implementing PHAs. Discussion: PHAs are important accessibility tools, and this study has identified barriers and facilitators to their use by healthcare providers and volunteers communicating with patients with hearing loss. These findings lay the groundwork to test future interventions to promote the increased uptake of PHA devices and greater access to healthcare for older patients experiencing hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.