ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2026
Beyond individual willingness: family veto, legal knowledge, and the dynamics of organ donation in Türkiye.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: The aim was to understand the factors underlying the dynamics of organ donation behavior by focusing on three different aspects. Three models were tested in this regard, namely (i) individual willingness for the donation of one's own organs, (ii) willingness to approve organ donation for close relatives, and (iii) a family veto gap. Materials and methods: A national-level adult sample from the Eurobarometer 72.3 survey (collected in 2009) conducted in Türkiye was utilized. Standard and penalized logistic regression models were employed to conduct the analyses. Results: The results show that discussing organ donation with family members and being aware of the organ donation law were associated with increased willingness to donate organs in all the study models. In addition, being a woman was associated with willingness to donate one's own organs and approval for relatives, and living in an urban area was associated with approving donation for close family members. In the last model (the family veto gap) both family discussions and knowledge of the legal regulations were associated with a higher likelihood of discrepancy between personal willingness and family authorization decisions. Conclusion: Social communication and legal awareness have a pivotal role in shaping organ donation decisions in Türkiye. Therefore, health policies that encourage social conversations and raise public awareness regarding legal regulations on organ donation may help narrow the family veto gap and strengthen societal support for organ donation. Future studies could be beneficial by including cultural and religious factors and using longitudinal approaches to better capture how donation decisions evolve over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.