ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Effects of Mechanical Nasal Stimulation on Olfaction.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Experimental studies have shown that the olfactory sensory receptor neurons not only identify odors and assess odor concentrations, but also act as respiratory mechanical sensors that respond to nasal airflow during breathing. Both odor detection and mechanical sensing appear mediated by a shared cellular mechanism. This prospective, single-arm, uncontrolled, pilot study was conducted to ascertain whether olfactory nerve mechanical stimulation provided by a nasal breathing oscillation device (Goodair Nosebuds) could influence olfaction when olfaction was assessed objectively. The study was performed on participants, who felt that their olfaction could be improved. Methods: Participants wore a nasal breathing oscillation device (Goodair Nosebuds) ten minutes twice a day for four weeks. At the beginning of the study and after four weeks, the participants' olfaction was assessed. Olfactory testing was performed using Sniffin' Sticks (phenyl ethyl alcohol threshold, odor discrimination and odor identification). Results: After four weeks, participants using the nasal breathing oscillation device (Goodair Nosebuds), had an increase in olfactory function in phenyl ethyl alcohol threshold, and odor identification when compared to baseline. The global olfactory score (the sum of the three scores) increased. Conclusion: This prospective, single-arm, uncontrolled, pilot study indicates that olfactory nerve mechanical stimulation was associated with an improvement in olfactory scores. Trial Registration: The study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR; ACTRN12625001131448).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.