ArticleReumatologia2026
Machine learning analysis of treatment and complication patterns in rheumatoid arthritis case reports (1995-2025).
Article in Reumatologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to identify research trends and thematic structures in case reports related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and complications published between 1995 and September 2025. By applying unsupervised machine learning (ML), the study sought to uncover longitudinal patterns and cross-domain relationships that may not be fully captured in traditional reviews or large-scale epidemiological studies. Material and methods: Bibliographic data were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection using the search term "rheumatoid arthritis and complications," limited to case reports published between 1995 and 2025. Titles, key words, and abstracts were combined into unified text documents and processed with natural language processing (NLP) techniques. Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency was applied for text vectorization. Topic extraction employed non-negative matrix factorization, and clustering was performed using K-means. The optimal number of clusters was determined based on the highest Silhouette Score (0.636). Analyses were conducted in Python (Version 3.10.5) within the PyCharm environment (Version 2022.1.3). Results: The unsupervised ML framework identified two major and stable clusters among 1,200 case reports: a pharmacological and immunological management cluster and a surgical and postoperative complications cluster. Cluster 1 included 890 reports characterized by pharmacological and immunological terms such as "TNF," "therapy," and "anti," while cluster 2 contained 310 reports dominated by orthopedic terms such as "arthroplasty," "knee," and "revision." Reproducibility tests across five runs demonstrated consistent clustering patterns, supporting methodological reliability. Conclusions: This NLP and ML-based analysis revealed a dual structure in RA complication literature, reflecting immunological treatment-related complications and surgical outcomes. Beyond confirming known domains, the study provides a data-driven characterization of their evolution and overlap, offering insights into the evolution of research themes in RA management. This approach demonstrates the potential of unsupervised ML for longitudinal mapping of clinical research domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.