ArticleGenetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference : [proceedings]. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference2026
Audience-Customized Translation of Rule-Based Evidence with Large Language Models Across Multiplexer Benchmarks.
Article in Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference : [proceedings]. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evolutionary rule-based machine learning (ERBML) algorithms can capture complex relationships while still yielding highly interpretable models comprised of IF:THEN rules. During prediction, 'matching' rules contribute to, and form the explanation for, the model's prediction. However, rules and their associated parameters (in their raw form) are likely too technical for their intended users. This study examines the feasibility of using a large language model (LLM) to translate the prediction evidence from matching rules into natural language text for different audiences, e.g. layman, clinician, expert. Using models trained by the 'HEROS' ERBML on MUX benchmarks, we evaluate LLM text quality metrics under different scenarios (i.e. 1,800 prediction explanations). We observe that (1), intuitively, LLM quality performance improves on HEROS models that have been more ideally trained, (2) making a glossary available to the LLM to define feature names generally raises explanation
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.