Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42677193›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

Foundation models for cardiovascular diseases and medicine.

Jiancheng Ye, Sophie Bronstein, Malak Abu Hashish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiancheng YeWeill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Sophie BronsteinWeill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Malak Abu HashishTouro University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Great Falls, MT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide, accounting for more than 17 million deaths annually. Foundation models (FMs) are large-scale artificial intelligence systems pre-trained on broad datasets and increasingly studied for cardiovascular diagnosis, risk prediction, workflow support, and treatment personalization. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on FMs applied to cardiovascular medicine, including text-based, image-based, multimodal, and time-series models. The review examined model architectures, training strategies, performance metrics, clinical applications, implementation challenges, and evidence maturity using a three-tier framework. Cardiovascular FMs show promising but unevenly validated capabilities across multiple applications. Electrocardiogram (ECG)-based models such as ECGFounder have reported strong external validation performance for rhythm and conduction diagnoses, whereas imaging models such as Echo-Vision-FM support cardiac function assessment and pathology classification. Multimodal models, including CardioGPT and EchoCLIP, illustrate the potential value of integrating clinical text, imaging, and physiological signals, although several remain at a conceptual or proof-of-concept stage. Foundation models may become important tools in cardiovascular medicine by supporting earlier diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical decision-making. However, the current evidence base remains heterogeneous, and major barriers persist, including limited interpretability, underrepresentation of diverse populations in training data, regulatory uncertainty, computational demands, and workflow integration challenges. Inclusive data development, transparent reporting, external validation, prospective clinical evaluation, and interdisciplinary implementation research are needed before these models can be deployed safely and equitably in routine cardiovascular care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCardiovascular diseaseDeep learningDigital healthFoundation modelsPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID42677193
PMCPMC13528242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.