ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2026
Epidemiologically validated spatial modelling reveals fine-scale heat health risks.
Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heat exposure drives substantial global disease and mortality burdens, making spatially explicit heat health risk assessment essential for targeted adaptation. Existing studies apply diverse modeling approaches yet rarely evaluate them systematically because reliable epidemiological validation data remain scarce; conventional risk indices further depend on subjective indicator aggregation and expert weighting. Here we show an integrative geographically neural network weighted regression (GNNWR) framework validated against epidemiologically derived heat-attributable mortality fraction at the subdistrict level. The framework achieves stronger predictive performance and better generalization than ordinary least squares, multiplicative model, random forest, geographically weighted regression (GWR), multi-scale GWR, and other geographically weighted machine learning models, with consistent alignment between training and test sets and no evidence of overfitting. By learning spatial weights through a neural network, it simultaneously captures spatial non-stationarity and nonlinear relationships among meteorological, air pollution, demographic, socioeconomic, and built environment variables without requiring predefined index construction. It enables prediction in data-sparse areas and generates consistent high-resolution (100 m grid), subdistrict, and district-level risk maps, while identifying fine particulate matter (PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.