ReviewCureus2026
AI-Augmented Teach-Back in Dentistry: From Patient Education to Verified Clinical Understanding.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral diseases remain among the most prevalent chronic conditions worldwide, yet their prevention and long-term management depend heavily on patient understanding of self-care, maintenance protocols, and procedural risks. Existing educational programs have not solved this problem because most individuals do not understand dental health, and communication with patients remains poor, which results in poor treatment outcomes. The teach-back method functions as an evidence-based communication tool that helps staff members confirm that patients have grasped essential information, but dental practitioners use it inconsistently because it requires manual work and produces no measurable biological results. This review presents artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented teach-back as a communication system that unites dental evidence with healthcare field evidence to create a scalable system that maintains equity and enables verification. The review uses conceptual synthesis based on implementation science together with digital health and clinical communication research to study teach-back applications in pediatric, preventive, periodontal, surgical, geriatric, tele-dental, and public-health dentistry, which face three main challenges: standardization, workflow burden, and outcome measurement. Advances in natural language processing, speech recognition, semantic understanding scoring, explainable AI (XAI), and risk-adaptive communication systems have enabled teach-back to evolve from its original form as a recall-based educational method into a clinical process that can be audited and produces long-term results. This review uses three established frameworks together with the SALIENT AI-specific governance model to evaluate organisation readiness for implementation, their ethical safeguards, and their methods for achieving equity. The system provides three main advantages, including its ability to combine information from various fields, its design to match actual operational procedures, and its direct connection between communication verification methods and biological measurement results. This study depends on indirect evidence that comes from non-dental environments but does not include future dental research studies. The review presents communication as a clinical risk that can be modified and demonstrates how AI-augmented teach-back functions as a ready-to-use system for dental care improvement through better patient adherence and enhanced safety and equity distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.