Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42677125›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026

Predicting disease progression in progressive cerebellar ataxias: integrating clinical, imaging, fluid, genetic, and digital biomarkers.

Yingxu Hao, Xianjun Hao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yingxu HaoThe First Affiliated Hospital (Brain Disease Center), Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xianjun HaoHebi Coal Industry Group General Hospital, Hebi, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progressive cerebellar ataxias, including the polyglutamine spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, and SCA6), Friedreich ataxia, and the autosomal recessive and sporadic forms, are rare, clinically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorders. Disease-modifying therapies, notably antisense oligonucleotides and the approved compound omaveloxolone, are now entering or reaching the clinic, which makes reliable prediction of disease progression a central obstacle to trial success. Rarity, slow and variable decline, and a quantifiable premanifest window together demand sensitive, validated tools to forecast who will progress, how fast, and when symptoms begin. This review synthesizes evidence across five complementary biomarker domains, clinical, imaging, fluid, genetic, and digital, and judges their readiness for forecasting onset and progression. Clinical scales such as SARA capture genotype-specific trajectories but lose sensitivity at the extremes of the disease course. Volumetric, microstructural, and spectroscopic MRI and blood neurofilament light chain change before ataxia onset and predict subsequent decline, whereas repeat length and genetic modifiers set prior risk. Wearable-sensor gait and balance metrics detect change earlier than clinical scales and sharply reduce required sample sizes. We argue that no single modality satisfies every context of use, and that stage-specific, multimodal composites, integrated through harmonized international cohorts and machine learning, offer the most credible path to prognostic enrichment and to shorter, adequately powered, and preventive trials.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaDisease ProgressionBiomarkersHumansNeuroimagingBiomarkersdigital biomarkersdisease progressionneurofilament light chainneuroimaging biomarkersspinocerebellar ataxia

Identifiers

PMID42677125
PMCPMC13527938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.