Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42677029›Full record

ArticleArchives animal breeding2026

Assessment of reproductive performance in dairy cows using explainable machine learning.

Elif Çelik Gürbulak, Uğur Kara, Esra Canooğlu, Hazal Aysın Arslan, Ece Çetin, Mehmet Demirel, Kutlay Gürbulak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives animal breeding, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elif Çelik GürbulakDepartment of Biometrics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Uğur KaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7977-6826
Esra CanooğluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Hazal Aysın ArslanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0880-8334
Ece ÇetinDepartment of Animal Science, Institute of Health Sciences, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Mehmet DemirelBoğazlıyan Vocational School, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0865-2877
Kutlay GürbulakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive performance is a key determinant of productivity and economic sustainability in dairy farming and is influenced by a complex interaction of biological and management-related factors. This study aimed to evaluate reproductive performance in dairy cows and to identify the most influential risk factors at both global and individual animal levels using an explainable machine learning framework. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) regression model was applied to evaluate reproductive performance based on days to first insemination. Model performance was assessed using standard regression metrics. Model interpretability was achieved through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), allowing both global feature importance assessment and local, animal-specific interpretations. SHAP analysis indicated that age had the greatest contribution to the model predictions, followed by mastitis, retained placenta, ovarian cysts, ketosis, and metritis. The direction and magnitude of the SHAP contributions varied across individual animals, highlighting heterogeneity in the model explanations. Model performance on the independent test dataset (RMSE

Identifiers

PMID42677029
PMCPMC13528777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.