ArticleArchives animal breeding2026
Assessment of reproductive performance in dairy cows using explainable machine learning.
Article in Archives animal breeding, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reproductive performance is a key determinant of productivity and economic sustainability in dairy farming and is influenced by a complex interaction of biological and management-related factors. This study aimed to evaluate reproductive performance in dairy cows and to identify the most influential risk factors at both global and individual animal levels using an explainable machine learning framework. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) regression model was applied to evaluate reproductive performance based on days to first insemination. Model performance was assessed using standard regression metrics. Model interpretability was achieved through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), allowing both global feature importance assessment and local, animal-specific interpretations. SHAP analysis indicated that age had the greatest contribution to the model predictions, followed by mastitis, retained placenta, ovarian cysts, ketosis, and metritis. The direction and magnitude of the SHAP contributions varied across individual animals, highlighting heterogeneity in the model explanations. Model performance on the independent test dataset (RMSE
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.