ArticleJournal of computational physics2026
An Immersed Interface Method for Incompressible Flows and Near Contact.
Article in Journal of computational physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Immersed Interface Method for Incompressible Flows and Near Contact.Journal of computational physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an enhanced immersed interface method for simulating incompressible fluid flows in thin gaps between closely spaced immersed boundaries. This regime, common in engineered structures such as tribological interfaces and bearing assemblies, poses significant computational challenges because of limitations in grid resolution and the prohibitive cost of mesh refinement near contact. The immersed interface method imposes jump conditions that capture stress discontinuities generated by forces that are concentrated along immersed boundaries. Our approach introduces a bilinear velocity interpolation operator in two spatial dimensions that incorporates jump conditions from multiple nearby interfaces if they occupy the same interpolation stencil. Furthermore, we show that the methodology developed for resolving distinct interfaces in near contact also improves accuracy for single-interface geometries with intrinsically sharp features, in which multiple interface segments intersect a single grid cell. Numerical results demonstrate substantial improvements in both interface and Eulerian velocity accuracy compared with a lubrication-corrected immersed boundary method, even for interfaces whose separation is one-fiftieth of a computational grid cell. The results also show that this formulation effectively resolves flows near sharp geometric features. The proposed method improves upon previous interpolation schemes and eliminates the need for prior knowledge of interface orientation or geometry. This makes it broadly applicable to a wide range of fluid-structure interaction problems involving near-contact dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.