Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42676994›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2026

Community governance and nutrition-oriented cancer care for women: policy pathways to reduce survival disparities.

Liqian Hao, Xiaomin Ma, Yiyan Feng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liqian HaoShanxi Normal University, Taiyuan, China.
Xiaomin MaShanxi Engineering Vocational College, Taiyuan, China.
Yiyan FengShanxi Normal University, Taiyuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition is increasingly recognized as a modifiable determinant of treatment tolerance, metabolic health, quality of life, and survivorship outcomes among women with cancer. However, nutrition-oriented cancer care is often delivered as an individual-level clinical recommendation, while many determinants of dietary behavior and nutritional vulnerability arise outside oncology clinics. Food insecurity, unequal food environments, limited dietitian availability, fragmented referral systems, low nutrition literacy, transport barriers, and gendered caregiving roles can prevent women with breast, cervical, ovarian, endometrial, and other cancers from receiving timely and effective nutrition support. Community governance provides a policy framework for linking oncology services with primary care, public health agencies, community organizations, food assistance programs, digital platforms, and patient groups. This Mini Review examines how community governance can strengthen nutrition-oriented cancer care for women and reduce survival disparities. We summarize pathways through which community-level conditions influence nutritional status and survivorship, distinguish established evidence from promising implementation models and expert-policy rationale, and propose governance mechanisms for nutrition screening, referral, food support, and follow-up. Community-governed nutrition care should move beyond service volume and evaluate whether nutritionally vulnerable women receive accessible, culturally appropriate, and outcome-oriented support across the cancer continuum.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth PolicyHealth Status DisparitiesNeoplasmsNutrition PolicyFemaleHumansNutritional Statuscancer nutritioncommunity governancefood insecurityhealth equitynutrition policyservice integrationsurvivorship carewomen's cancers

Identifiers

PMID42676994
PMCPMC13527662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.