Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42676992›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters

Impact of Aggregation Functions and Learning Settings in Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning for Skin Cancer Detection.

Bela Shrimali, Rebakah Geddam, Hemant Ghayvat, Rushi Shah, Mohit Ginglani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bela ShrimaliUnitedworld Institute of Technology Karnavati University Gandhinagar India.
Rebakah GeddamUnitedworld Institute of Technology Karnavati University Gandhinagar India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5466-2048
Hemant GhayvatComputer Science and Media Technology Department Faculty of Technology Linnaeus University Växjö Sweden.
Rushi ShahInstitute of Technology Nirma University Gujarat India.
Mohit GinglaniInstitute of Technology Nirma University Gujarat India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer is among the most common malignant tumors worldwide, and early detection is essential to improve patient survival and recovery. Conventional AI-based diagnostic approaches rely on centralized data, which raises security and privacy concerns. This paper presents an implementation of federated learning that addresses these challenges by enabling collaborative model training among simulated distributed client nodes while ensuring that raw patient data remains confidential. A convolutional neural network architecture, ResNet50, is employed at client nodes, with preprocessing steps including image augmentation, contrast enhancement, and lesion segmentation to improve feature extraction on the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) dataset. Multiple aggregation algorithms are implemented at the central server, along with both vertical and horizontal federated learning settings. Their performance is evaluated using metrics such as precision, accuracy, recall, and F1-score. In the horizontal federated learning setting, the FedNova aggregation approach outperformed other methods, achieving an accuracy of 76.45%, F1-score of 0.73, and a recall of 0.72, demonstrating enhanced overall classification performance among the evaluated aggregation algorithms and stable convergence across clients. These results highlight the impact of federated learning settings and aggregation strategies on overall skin cancer detection performance.

Indexed as

AI in healthcareconvolutional neural networksdeep learningdermatologyimage classificationISIC datasetmedical image analysisskin cancer detection

Identifiers

PMID42676992
PMCPMC13527526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.