ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2026
Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resection.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has emerged as a common approach in surgical procedures involving the lung, mediastinum, thoracic wall, and diaphragm. Recent studies have described the performance of diagnostic and therapeutic VATS procedures via a single port, and the technique has become the preferred diagnostic modality for various intrathoracic pathologies and for patients deemed unsuitable for fine-needle biopsy. Materials and methods: The records of 57 patients who underwent diagnostic and therapeutic uniportal VATS for wedge pulmonary resection between January 2024 and January 2025 were reviewed retrospectively, and details regarding the surgical method, length of hospital stay, complications, and diagnostic accuracy were recorded. The procedures were performed for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and for the treatment of undiagnosed pulmonary nodules and primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Results: Of the total sample, 15.8% (n = 9) were female and 84.2% (n = 48) were male, and the mean age was 39.9 years (range 16-77 years). All 57 patients underwent uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection, with 35 treated for pneumothorax and 22 for other conditions. Those treated for pneumothorax were predominantly younger, with a mean age of 26.6 years ( range 16-77 years), while the mean age of the nonpneumothorax patients was 56 years (28-77 years). Conclusion: Thoracoscopic surgery is now the preferred method for both patients and surgeons, and the role of VATS in diagnosis and treatment is growing and gaining value. As a minimally invasive procedure, VATS is associated with a comfortable postoperative period for both the patient and surgeon, which supports its role as a safe and feasible approach to wedge pulmonary resections for certain indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.