ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2026
The Usefulness of Machine Learning Models to Predict Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.
Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Usefulness of Machine Learning Models to Predict Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The treatment available for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has remained unsatisfactory. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), capturing patient-perceived health status and well-being, are vehicles for measuring and improving the efficacy of care. This study aimed to establish machine learning (ML) models to predict PROMs in CRSwNP patients using minimally invasive and easily acquired clinical data. Methods: We collected commonly available clinical predictive data from 437 patients and established four separate ML models in the training set: a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-based Logistic regression, a random forest (RF) regression, a gradient-boosted decision tree (GBDT), and a deep neural network (DNN). In the test and independent external validation sets, the predictive performance of these models was measured by calculating C statistics, expected prediction results, and decision curves. A feature-ranking analysis was performed using the ML algorithm. We then developed a predictive nomogram using LASSO-based Logistic regression. Results: The models performed well on an independent external validation set, with no statistically significant differences in generalization ability metrics between groups. LASSO regression identified key features of the predictive PROMs. A nomogram was created based on multivariate Logistic regression with LASSO regularization. Conclusions: All four ML models demonstrated similar performance in predicting PROMs in CRSwNP patients from which a clinical nomogram was developed. Early prediction of the subjective treatment response is crucial, as it influences clinician decisions and facilitates effective doctor-patient communication preoperatively; this could lead to more precise and personalized treatment for CRSwNP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.