ArticleReumatologia2026
Screening and management of systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary complications in Iraq: insights from a national survey of rheumatologists and pulmonologists.
Article in Reumatologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated the screening and management approaches of Iraqi rheumatologists and pulmonologists regarding systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) and pulmonary hypertension (PHT), identifying key gaps and areas for improvement. Material and methods: An internet-based survey was distributed to Iraqi rheumatologists and pulmonologists from August to October 2024. The survey collected demographic data, screening methods, treatment initiation criteria, and therapeutic preferences. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the responses, and trends were identified on the basis of physician speciality and experience level. Results: A total of 116 participants responded (75.9% rheumatologists, 24.1% pulmonologists). Routine screening for ILD was reported by 88.8% of respondents, with 62.1% screening at diagnosis. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) was the preferred screening tool (61.7%), followed by pulmonary function tests (52.2%). However, only 31% of patients are routinely screened for PHT, with most relying on unexplained dyspnoea or annual assessments. Mycophenolate mofetil was the preferred first-line treatment for SSc-ILD (87.5%), whereas rituximab and azathioprine were less commonly used. Treatment decisions were guided primarily by HRCT findings and pulmonary function trends. Despite 89.3% reporting multidisciplinary collaboration, variability in screening and treatment approaches suggests inconsistencies in guideline adherence. Conclusions: This study revealed inconsistencies in the screening and management of SSc-ILD and PHT among Iraqi specialists. While ILD screening is commonly performed via HRCT, PHT screening remains suboptimal. Mycophenolate mofetil is the preferred treatment, but adherence to international guidelines varies. Strengthening standardised protocols and multidisciplinary collaboration is essential to improve patient care. Future research should prioritise the identification of barriers to the effective implementation of clinical guidelines and the evaluation of the effects of standardised care practices on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.